Rastrick Precision Components

None of the three documents for Rastrick Precision Components is executed. The final Growth proposal of 17 Sep 2026 prices year one at £50k (£62k total first year) and supersedes the draft of 14 Sep 2026. Its connector scope wording conflicts with itself.

Executed: none of the documents has a stored status of executed, so there are no contracted price, term, billing or service levels. All three documents were read, and the roll-up covers them all.

Open items: the Proposal of 17 Sep 2026, stored as final, offers Growth at £50k for the year-one subscription plus implementation at twelve thousand pounds, £62k total first year. It is still an open item until an order form is signed.

Open items: Proposal v1 of 14 Sep 2026 is a draft marked as not approved for distribution, with the same figures. The final proposal of 17 Sep 2026 supersedes it, but it could still be mistaken for agreed terms.

Open items: the Security Questionnaire of 29 Aug 2026 was completed by Theo Gallagher, Solutions Engineer, and is stored as final. It is a set of answers, not a contract, and the record does not show that the customer accepted it.

Contradictions: no figure or term differs between documents in the reads. Within the Proposal of 17 Sep 2026, the opening scope says up to three additional systems, but the inclusions list says up to five.

Contradictions: the Security Questionnaire of 29 Aug 2026 promises a critical-incident response within one business hour. Neither proposal states a P1 response time or an availability percentage, so the order form should settle both.

Commitments: no executed document exists, so there are no live obligations. The proposals describe a nightly refresh complete by 07:00 UK time on business days and an eight-week implementation, but neither is binding.

Gaps: neither proposal names a customer signatory, start date, term end, payment terms or service credits. The records do not show whether an order form has been drafted or sent.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · 13 Oct 2026