Tom Ashdown

Rookhaven Asset Management / BB-Demo – Demo

Callcompleted

Rookhaven Asset Management: documents logo Rookhaven Asset Management: documents · 2026-07-28 14:15

Eleanor Whitlock said the demo met her first criterion on sample data but she cannot accept the second until documentation and a security review are done. The Enterprise deal was stated as £155,000 in total, with a target of 18 Dec 2026.

What was said

What this says

Current to 11 Oct 26

Eleanor Whitlock said the demo met her first criterion on sample data but she cannot accept the second until documentation and a security review are done. The Enterprise deal was stated as £155,000 in total, with a target of 18 Dec 2026.

What happened: Theo Gallagher demoed the brain on Rookhaven's sample client data, covering one view of a client, source lineage, conflicting values and pages. Eleanor set two criteria: one view of a client, and visible provenance for each answer.

Customer view: Eleanor said the first criterion was met on sample data and the lineage display is encouraging. She cannot say the second is satisfied until she has the documentation and security has looked at it.

Commercial: Tom Ashdown said the Enterprise deal stands at £155,000 in total with implementation inside it, and 18 Dec 2026 is a target, nothing firmer. Julian is the approver and Eleanor will not speak for him.

Watch: Henry Calloway asked about training time and exit. The exit answer rests on the Snowflake account, and the documentation promised must be specific.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 11 Oct 2026

Themes

Current to 9 Oct 26
Theme
Enterprise demo, security review
Importance
renewal
Sentiment
mixed
Voice
champion

Who was there

BB-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Theo Gallagher to send the security documentation, questionnaire pack and open items with owners.
  • Tom Ashdown to send a written split of implementation and subscription for Julian.
  • Tom Ashdown to arrange a short call with Julian and Eleanor once the security review is under way.

Risks

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Eleanor will not accept the traceability criterion without documentation and a security review.
  • Julian, the approver, was not on the call and Eleanor will not speak for him.

Opportunities

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • A £155,000 Enterprise deal, with implementation inside that figure, is under discussion.
  • Henry Calloway is engaged and will supply a glossary of internal client terms.

Transcript

  1. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Afternoon, all. Can everyone hear me? Theo, you're muted, I think. There you go.
  2. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Thanks, Tom. Good afternoon. Yes, I can hear you now.
  3. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Good afternoon. Henry is with me, he has just sat down.
  4. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Hello, everyone. Sorry, I was running behind with a client meeting. Hopefully not missed anything.
  5. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Not a thing, Henry, you're bang on time. How's the week been, anyway? Proper summer yet, or is it still grey out there?
  6. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Warm, finally. Which makes the office a bit unbearable, to be honest.
  7. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Before we begin, let me restate what I would like us to leave with today. Can the brain give client service and distribution one view of a client, and can I see where each answer comes from? Those are the two things.
  8. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    That's clear, Eleanor, thank you. I'll structure the demo around exactly those two. Let me share my screen. Can you see it?
  9. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Yes, we can.
  10. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Good. What you're looking at is the brain running on the sample of client data that Eleanor's team shared with us. It's not production, and I'll say where something is illustrative rather than real. First, a plain question. I'll ask it to give me a summary of one client's relationship with Rookhaven.
  11. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    That's the sort of thing my team does by opening four or five screens.
  12. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Right. So here's the answer. It's pulled from the CRM records, the service tickets and the call notes, and you can see the sources listed beneath it. If I click this one, it takes me to the underlying record and shows when it was last refreshed.
  13. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    What's the lineage for that refresh? If it says last refreshed, is that the source system's timestamp or the brain's?
  14. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Good distinction. It shows when the brain last loaded from the source. The record's own last modified date is a separate field, and both are visible here. We can evidence that, and I'll include it in the security and data documentation so it's written down rather than just shown.
  15. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Thank you. Please do. I would not be able to accept it on the strength of a demonstration alone.
  16. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    That's absolutely fair, Eleanor. We'd expect that.
  17. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Let me move on to the distribution side. Henry, give me a question you'd really ask before a client meeting.
  18. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Okay. Something like, what have we discussed with this client recently and is anything outstanding?
  19. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Fine. I'll type that in as you've said it. Give it a moment. There. It lists the recent conversations, pulls out the open items from tickets and emails, and flags one where a reply has been waiting a while.
  20. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Hm. That's useful, actually. I'd want to know how it decides what counts as outstanding, mind. I wouldn't want my team to trust it blindly.
  21. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Quite right, and you shouldn't. It's inferring from the records, so it's only as good as what was written down. The point is that it shows its working, so your people can check. I'd describe it as a faster starting point rather than a final authority.
  22. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    That is a sensible way to put it.
  23. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Let me show you pages next. These are saved views your teams could build, so a client page is always the same structure whoever opens it. There's also a dashboards builder, which on Enterprise you'd have, and which Eleanor's team might use for data quality.
  24. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Can I see what happens when two systems disagree? For example, an address differs between the CRM and the service system.
  25. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Yes. I've set one up. Here the same client has two different values. The brain doesn't silently pick one. It shows both with their sources and dates, and a person decides which is right.
  26. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    That is precisely the behaviour from a governance standpoint that I would want. Thank you.
  27. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    How long would it take before my team could use this day to day? I'm conscious we're busy, and I can't release people for weeks of training.
  28. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    I'll jump in, Henry, if that's okay, Theo. There's an implementation period, and for Enterprise it's a longer one because it includes security review support. I'll confirm the exact plan in writing rather than say a number from memory. What I can say is the training is light, because people just ask questions.
  29. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    That's reassuring. Thank you.
  30. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Before I forget, security. Eleanor, you said earlier that your security team would review before any commitment. I can walk through how we'd handle that. I'll list what I'd propose. One, we send our security documentation and the questionnaire responses. Two, you share your own requirements and any open points. Three, we agree owners and dates for each finding. Four, we hold a call with your security reviewers to go through the evidence.
  31. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    That sequence is acceptable. I should say I would want each answer to have a control reference and a source.
  32. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    That's how we write them. Every answer carries a control reference and the evidence attached. If something is a plan rather than a control already in place, we'll label it that way and give the dated commitment. I won't describe a draft as final.
  33. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Thank you, Theo. That is very helpful.
  34. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Can I ask something slightly different? Does it get confused with the way we name things? We have a few internal terms for client types that aren't in any system's standard fields.
  35. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    It can, to begin with. We'd map your terms during implementation, so the brain answers in your language. If you could give us a short glossary beforehand, that would help a great deal.
  36. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    I can do that. It's mostly in people's heads, but I'll get it written down.
  37. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Which is half the value, honestly. Getting it out of people's heads.
  38. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Tom, may I ask where we stand on the commercial side? Julian will want to understand what he is being asked to approve.
  39. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Course. So we've been talking about Enterprise, and the deal as it stands is £155,000 in total, with the one-off implementation inside that figure. I'll put the split between implementation and subscription in writing so Julian has something clean. And we're still working towards 18 Dec 2026 as a target, nothing firmer.
  40. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Thank you. I will brief Julian. I should be clear that I will not speak for him on the decision.
  41. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Wouldn't expect you to. Perhaps once the security review is under way we get a short call with him and you, so he hears it directly.
  42. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    That would be sensible.
  43. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Last thing from me. What if we stop using it? Can we get our data out? I'm thinking of what happens if it doesn't work for us.
  44. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Good question, and it's an easy one because it runs in your own Snowflake account. The data remains yours, in your environment. The exit plan is part of the documentation I'll send, and I'll make sure it's specific rather than general.
  45. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Brilliant. That answers it.
  46. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    To summarise from my side. The demonstration met the first criterion on the sample data, and the source and lineage display is encouraging. I cannot say the second is satisfied until I have the documentation and security has looked at it.
  47. Theo Gallagher
    Theo Gallagher None
    Understood, and that's the right position. I'll send the documentation and the questionnaire pack, and list the open items with owners on each side.
  48. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    And I'll send the commercial note. Henry, glossary from you when you can. Eleanor, anything else you need from us?
  49. Eleanor Whitlock
    Eleanor Whitlock None
    Not at present. Thank you both, this was a considered session.
  50. Henry Calloway
    Henry Calloway None
    Thanks, everyone. Really useful.
  51. Tom Ashdown
    Tom Ashdown None
    Cheers, all. Let's get something in the diary for the security call. Speak soon.

BB-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Brain is the tool. Built by site/build_site.py from the site tree, data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Brain is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask Brain in the header. Type a question, or pick one of the examples.

The site itself does not call an AI model; answers in Claude come from the same figures you see here.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations75
People at customers290
BB-Demo staff40
Calls784
Email threads1,169
Support tickets449
Documents477
Deals117
Invoices101
Events49
News items56

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the brain from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BB-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Brain is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email support@b-brain.example or talk to your B-Brain account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Ask B

Ask B

B-Brain · read-only