Pendle Valley Academies

All three Pendle Valley Academies documents are read and none is executed: a security questionnaire from 30 Apr 2025, a draft proposal from 15 May 2025 and a final proposal from 20 May 2025. No contracted price, term or service level can be confirmed from them.

Executed: No document for Pendle Valley Academies has the stored status executed. Contracted price, start date, end date, term and service levels cannot be stated from these records.

Open items: The draft Proposal v1 of 15 May 2025, written by Priya Raman, offers the Growth tier at £44k a year plus a £12k eight-week implementation, £56k for Year 1. The final Proposal of 20 May 2025 repeats those figures and adds up to forty users.

Open items: Both proposals are offers, not contracts. The 20 May 2025 proposal lists security review, sign-off and order form signature as next steps, and no record shows any of them completed.

Contradictions: The two proposals agree on price, tier and billing. The documents do not contradict each other, but the 30 Apr 2025 security questionnaire states a P1 first response of 4 business hours.

Contradictions: That P1 time matches the Starter level, not the 1 business hour Growth standard. The two proposals state no service levels, so no document sets a baseline to check it against.

Commitments: No document is executed, so no live obligations can be listed. The questionnaire describes 99.5% availability, refresh by 07:00 UK time and UK-region Snowflake residency, but it is a final questionnaire, not a contract.

Gaps: The roll-up covers all three documents held. No record shows an executed order form, a signatory for the trust, a contract start date, named connectors or a connector live-by date.

Gaps: Finance should check whether invoices exist before treating Pendle Valley Academies as a contracted customer. The £44k matches the v1 Growth list, so any renewal pricing depends on paper not held here.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026