Ekholm Byggtjänst

Ekholm Byggtjänst has two Starter proposals from Lewis Kerr, a draft of 12 Jan 2026 and a final of 15 Jan 2026, both at £6,000 implementation and £22,000 year 1 subscription. No executed order form is held, so no contracted terms exist.

Executed: no document for Ekholm Byggtjänst has a stored status of executed, so there are no contracted price, dates, billing or service levels on file. The roll-up covers both documents held, and both were read.

Open items: the proposal of 15 Jan 2026 is stored as final, but it is an unsigned sales proposal that ends by pointing to the order form and security review. It could be mistaken for contracted terms.

Open items: the draft proposal v1 of 12 Jan 2026 is an earlier version prepared by Lewis Kerr. It is an open item and binds nobody.

Contradictions: the two proposals agree on price. Each states implementation £6,000, Year 1 subscription (Starter) £22,000 and total contract value £28,000 excluding VAT.

Contradictions: both proposals also give the same billing. Billing is annually in advance, net 30, implementation is invoiced on signature, and the subscription year starts from go-live.

Commitments: there are no live obligations, because nothing is executed. The proposal of 15 Jan 2026 describes Starter scope of up to 15 users, 4 connectors and 4 weeks of implementation, but only as an offer.

Gaps: neither document states availability, P1 response, refresh deadline, service credits or connector go-live dates. The records do not show whether Ekholm Byggtjänst accepted either proposal, whether an order form followed, or who received it.

Gaps: before any renewal or billing work, finance and the account lead should confirm whether an executed order form exists. They should not rely on the proposal figures.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · 11 Oct 2026