What was said
What this says
Current to 10 Oct 26Hannah Lowe asked Megan Alvarez on 11 Jun 2026 for a full session to walk through architecture, access model and written questionnaire answers. There is no customer response in the thread.
Ask: Hannah proposed Tuesday or Wednesday the following week, at 10:00 or 14:00 Megan's time. She asked who would attend and which findings to start with.
Scope: She will cover how the brain runs inside the customer's Snowflake account, the access model and the incident history in writing, and will confirm any uncertain control internally before answering.
Customer view: Not shown, as Megan did not reply in this thread.
The thread
Updated 9 Oct 26Messages
- Hannah Lowe 11 Jun 2026 15:49Hi Megan, Thanks for the time on our last call. I wanted to get the security review walkthrough into the diary while the open findings are still fresh, so here is how I'd suggest we run it. To be precise about scope: I'd like to cover the architecture end to end (how the brain runs inside your own Snowflake account, what leaves it and what does not), the access model, and the written answers to your questionnaire. I'll also address your question about incidents in the last ninety days in writing, so you have it on the record rather than only in conversation. The short answer on timing is that I can do Tuesday or Wednesday next week. The longer answer is that I'd rather not rush it, so please allow a full session. Either 10:00 or 14:00 your time would work for me on both days. Two things would help me prepare: - Who from your team will join, so I can pitch the detail at the right level. - Any findings you'd like me to start with, so I don't spend time on items you consider closed. If there is anything on your list where I'm not certain of the exact control, I'll check it internally and put the confirmed answer in writing rather than guess on the call. Thanks, Hannah