Matteo Ricci

Brenneck Pay / BB-Demo – Demo

Callcompleted

Brenneck Pay: documents logo Brenneck Pay: documents · 2025-11-03 09:00

Demo to Brenneck Pay's operations head, data engineering lead and a risk analyst on sample merchant data. The analyst found a merchant she had not looked at. Compliance wants data flow, access and EU evidence in writing.

What was said

What this says

Current to 11 Oct 26

Demo to Brenneck Pay's operations head, data engineering lead and a risk analyst on sample merchant data. The analyst found a merchant she had not looked at. Compliance wants data flow, access and EU evidence in writing.

What happened: Hannah Lowe showed a merchant page, chat questions, pages and the admin view on sample data Jonas Albrecht had loaded into a test schema. Aylin Kaya's question surfaced three merchants she already worried about and one she had not looked at.

Customer view: Katrin Vogelsang said the demo was more concrete than expected. Jonas wants logs of who asked what, and any schema change reviewed before production.

Commercial: Matteo Ricci restated £62,000 as the deal total, not an annual price. Katrin wants it split into one-off work and subscription, and the named connectors listed with days to go live.

Watch: Matteo will not commit connector dates until engineering agrees them. The 20 Jan 2026 order form target is, in Katrin's words, not a promise.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 11 Oct 2026

Themes

Current to 9 Oct 26
Theme
Demo, lineage and compliance
Importance
praise
Sentiment
positive
Voice
champion

Who was there

BB-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Matteo Ricci to send the proposal with one-off and subscription split out and connector dates agreed with engineering.
  • Hannah Lowe to send written answers on data flow, access and what text leaves the account.
  • Aylin Kaya to send five Monday questions by the end of the week.

Risks

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Compliance may need more than expected on data flow and which text reaches the answering model, delaying the 20 Jan 2026 target.
  • Connector go-live dates are not yet agreed by engineering, and the customer wants them in the proposal.
  • Cached page summaries share content across roles, which Jonas Albrecht wants reviewed before production.

Opportunities

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Four named sources fit inside Growth with room for a couple more, and the dashboards builder is included.
  • The admin view of questions and flat-line alerts gives the customer a way to show adoption and value.

Transcript

  1. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Good morning, everyone. Can you all hear me properly? I can see Katrin and Jonas, and I think Aylin is just joining.
  2. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Good morning, Matteo. Yes, clear on my side. Aylin is in the lobby, I have just let her in.
  3. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Hello, sorry, my camera was fighting with the laptop. Good morning, all.
  4. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Morning. Audio fine. Camera stays off, the VPN is not having a good day.
  5. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    No problem at all, Jonas. Grazie. Hannah is here as well, she will run the demo itself. Hannah, hello.
  6. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Hello, everyone. Thanks for making time. Before I share anything, what do you most need to know by the end of this hour? I would rather aim the demo at that than walk you through every page.
  7. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Good question. I sent a short agenda yesterday, I will read it quickly so we are aligned. One, how an account manager and merchant risk see the same merchant in one view. Two, what the brain does with our own data, not sample data. Three, where the data lives and who can access it. Four, next step and who owns it.
  8. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Perfect, that is exactly what I hoped for. Just to restate the timeline as I understand it: this is the demo, then a proposal from us, and you would like to be in a position to decide by the end of the quarter, with the order form targeted for 20 January 2026. Is that still right?
  9. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Yes, to be precise, 20 January 2026 is the target, not a promise. It depends on what our compliance team needs to see. Jonas, you have the most to say on that.
  10. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Compliance will want it in writing. Where the data sits, which role has access, how the nightly load works. I have read your architecture note. I have questions.
  11. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Good, bring them. I will cover architecture in the second half, and where I am not certain I will say so and put the answer in writing afterwards. Let me share my screen first. Can you see it?
  12. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Yes, I see a search box and a left-hand menu.
  13. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    That is the brain's home page. Everything you see here is built on the sample merchant data you let us load last week. Jonas, you loaded that in a test schema, correct?
  14. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Correct. Separate schema, read access only for the service role, and I checked the load history afterwards. Clean.
  15. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Lovely. So let me start with Katrin's first point. I am going to open one merchant page. Aylin, pick a merchant name from your list and I will search for it.
  16. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Try the sports retailer, the one with the high chargeback ratio in the summer.
  17. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Right. So here is the merchant page. At the top you have the payment volumes from your processing tables. Below that, the tickets from the helpdesk, the account manager's notes from the CRM, and the emails that mention this merchant. The point is that it is one view, rather than four tabs.
  18. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    What is the source for the chargeback figure? I mean, which table does it come from? If I show this to an auditor, I need to say where it came from.
  19. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Good, and that is a feature rather than a nicety. Every number on this page has a source link. If I click the figure, it shows the table, the column and the time of the last refresh. The short answer is that nothing is shown without lineage. The longer answer is that it can only be as good as the table it reads.
  20. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Mm. That is helpful. Let us come back to the refresh time, because it matters for risk.
  21. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Katrin, I will note that. Nightly refresh, finished before the working day starts. Hannah will show you where that is visible.
  22. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Right here, top right, last refresh. If a source fails to load, the page says so rather than quietly showing old numbers.
  23. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Can I ask something in plain words? Today, if a merchant looks risky, I export from three systems and paste them into a spreadsheet. Would I ask the brain instead?
  24. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Yes. Try it with me. Type a question in the chat, the way you would ask a colleague.
  25. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Okay. Which merchants have rising refund rates and an open ticket about settlement delays?
  26. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Give it a moment. It is reading across the tables and the helpdesk. There. A short list, and each row has the reasoning and the sources underneath.
  27. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Oh. That is three merchants I already worry about, and one I had not looked at. I would have taken an hour to find that.
  28. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    The fourth is interesting. Open it, please. I want to see whether the account manager knows about it.
  29. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Opening. The CRM note is from a few weeks ago and mentions a pricing conversation but not the settlement ticket. So this is a case where the two sides were not looking at the same thing.
  30. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Yes. That is precisely the problem I want solved. Risk sees one half, account management the other, and we argue about whose half is true.
  31. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Let me confirm that in writing afterwards, Katrin, because I think it should be the first line of the proposal. Merchants who stay, and risk and account management agreeing on a merchant.
  32. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Please. Good. Continue.
  33. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Let me show you pages next, because Growth also includes the dashboards builder. A page is a living summary that the brain keeps updated. I will create one for a merchant segment.
  34. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    So I choose the segment, add the sections, volumes, refunds, tickets, contacts, and then save it. Anyone with access can open it, and it refreshes every night with the rest.
  35. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Can I limit who sees the risk notes? Account managers should not see everything I write, at least not at first.
  36. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Good point, and that is a question for Jonas as well, because access follows the roles in your Snowflake account. To be precise, the brain does not invent its own permission model for your data. It inherits what the role can read.
  37. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Which role has access, then? Say it to me slowly. If I deny a table to a role, does the brain still answer from it?
  38. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    No. If the role cannot read the table, the answer cannot use it. Where I want to be careful is the cached summaries on pages. Those are generated by a service role and then shared with page viewers. So it is worth designing which pages are shared and with whom. I will put the exact behaviour in writing for you rather than describe it from memory.
  39. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Good. That is a schema change I would want to review before anything goes near production. And not on a Friday.
  40. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Agreed on both counts. We would do the connector work in a test schema first, as you did for the sample.
  41. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Let us talk about where the data lives. Our compliance team will ask this first. Matteo, you mentioned an EU region in the earlier call.
  42. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    I did, and I would rather you heard it precisely from me. The brain runs inside your own Snowflake account, so the data stays where your account is. You already host it in an EU region. What we do not do is copy your data to a separate place of our own. Hannah, please correct me if I overstate it.
  43. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    That is right, Matteo. The short answer is that the data stays in your account and your region. The longer answer is that there are a few supporting services, such as the model that answers questions, and compliance will want to know exactly what text leaves the account to reach it. I do not want to guess there. I will check with our security colleague and send you a written answer.
  44. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Yes, please. In writing, with the date. Our regulator will ask where processing happens, and what is the source for the answer we give them?
  45. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    What does your regulator need to see, exactly? If you tell me the form, we shape the document to it, rather than send you a generic one.
  46. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    A description of the data flow, a list of who can access what, and evidence that the data stays in the EU region. I will send the template compliance uses.
  47. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    And logs. If somebody asks the brain about a merchant, I want to know who asked and what it read.
  48. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    There is a record of questions and who asked them. I will show you that in the admin view now, because it is also how you see adoption.
  49. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    So, the admin page. Questions asked, by user, by week. Connectors and their status. Records indexed over time. If a source stops loading, you see the line go flat before anyone complains.
  50. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Fine. That I like. Flat line is a thing I can alert on.
  51. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    How many sources can we connect? We have the processing tables, the CRM, the helpdesk, and I think the shared mailbox. Is that too many?
  52. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Growth includes more than that, Aylin. Four would sit comfortably inside it, with room for a couple more later. I will put the exact limits in the proposal so there is no ambiguity.
  53. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Let us be careful here. Please make the proposal state the connectors we have named, and the days within which each is live. Otherwise somebody will say later that it was a verbal understanding.
  54. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Understood, and I agree. Though I will not commit a date for any connector until engineering has agreed it. Hannah will take the list to them this week and I will come back with their answer, not mine.
  55. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Good. That is acceptable. A date with a note is better than a date without one.
  56. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Can I try one more question? Something harder. What changed for this merchant over the last month that could explain the increase in disputes?
  57. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Please do, and I will say in advance that this is the kind of question where it gives you a pointer, not a verdict. Type it in.
  58. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    It found a change in the settlement schedule and two tickets. It does not say why, though.
  59. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Right, and that is the honest limit. It shows you what changed and where to look. The judgement stays with you.
  60. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    I prefer that. If it pretended to know why, I would trust it less.
  61. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Right. Practical question. How long does it take to get from here to live on our real data? I need to plan around the month end close.
  62. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    For Growth the implementation is a fixed fee and a fixed programme of weeks, and I would rather confirm it in the proposal than quote it from memory. What I can say now is the total for the deal is £62,000, and that is the deal total, not an annual price.
  63. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Understood. Please break that down in the proposal. Which part is the one-off work and which part is the subscription. Finance will ask in the first minute.
  64. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Of course. Let me confirm that in writing, split clearly, with what is included in each.
  65. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    And who from your side owns the connector work? One name. Not a team.
  66. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    That would be me during implementation, and our customer success manager, Elena Novak, afterwards for adoption. I will put the names in the plan.
  67. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Good. Let us agree the next step. Matteo, you send the proposal. Hannah, the written answers on data flow and access. Jonas and I send the compliance template. Aylin, would you write down five questions you would ask the brain on a normal Monday?
  68. Aylin Kaya
    Aylin Kaya None
    Yes, I can do that. I will send them by the end of the week.
  69. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Perfect. And I will keep the minutes of the actions and send them today, Katrin, since I know you would not forgive me otherwise.
  70. Katrin Vogelsang
    Katrin Vogelsang None
    Correct, I would not. Thank you, everyone. This was useful, and more concrete than I expected.
  71. Jonas Albrecht
    Jonas Albrecht None
    Same. I will send the template after I have checked it. Not before.
  72. Hannah Lowe
    Hannah Lowe None
    Thanks, all. I will be in touch with the written answers. Speak soon.
  73. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Grazie mille. Have a good day, everyone. Best regards.

BB-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Brain is the tool. Built by site/build_site.py from the site tree, data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Brain is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask Brain in the header. Type a question, or pick one of the examples.

The site itself does not call an AI model; answers in Claude come from the same figures you see here.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations150
People at customers573
BB-Demo staff48
Calls1,382
Email threads2,122
Support tickets789
Documents850
Deals217
Invoices187
Events49
News items84

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the brain from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BB-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Brain is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email support@b-brain.example or talk to your B-Brain account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

HelpAsk B

Ask B

B-Brain · read-only