Ivelbridge Software logo

Ivelbridge Software

Documents

What the paper says

Document roll-up

Current to 11 Oct 26

Ivelbridge Software has no executed document. The final Growth proposal of 28 Sep 2026 quotes £62,000 first year and £50,000 a year from year two, matching the 23 Sep 2026 draft. All three documents quote a four-hour first response.

Executed: no document for Ivelbridge Software has a stored status of executed, so no price, term, billing or service level is contracted. The roll-up covers all three documents held, and all three were read.

Open items: the final proposal dated 28 Sep 2026 quotes a first-year commitment of £62,000 (implementation plus subscription) and £50,000 a year from year two for the Growth tier. It has no signature, start date, term length or billing terms, and says the order form follows within a week of approval.

Open items: the draft Proposal v1 dated 23 Sep 2026 quotes the same two figures and the same service wording. It is the earlier version of the final proposal in the same folder and binds nobody.

Open items: the security questionnaire dated 16 Sep 2026, completed by Theo Gallagher, quotes 99.5% uptime, a nightly refresh by 07:00 UK time and a four-hour first response for priority issues. It states no price and defers to the order form.

Contradictions: the reads show no disagreement between the three documents on price, availability or response time. The final proposal adds scope the draft read does not record: connectors to up to eight systems and up to forty users.

Contradictions: all three documents quote a four-hour first response, which is wider than the standard Growth P1 first response of one business hour. Neither proposal says whether the four hours applies to P1, so a customer could read it as the Growth commitment.

Commitments: there are no live obligations, because nothing is executed. The service terms quoted in the proposals and the questionnaire are offers until an order form is signed.

Gaps: the documents do not show an order form, a customer signatory, a start date, payment terms, connector go-live dates or service credit terms. Lewis Kerr, Account Executive, is the B-Brain person resolved for both proposals; whether he should align the first response wording with the Growth P1 term before the order form is issued is the open question.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · 11 Oct 2026

Executed terms

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Billingnot recorded
  • Endnot recorded
  • Pricenot recorded
  • Service levels[]
  • Startnot recorded
  • Term monthsnot recorded

Documents

Updated 9 Oct 26

3 documents in 2 folders; 1 drafts hang on their executed paper.

  • presales

Size is importance: state 40%, category 20%, recency 25% (18-month half-life on the as-of date) and usage 15%. There are no view counts: usage means how many of our own analyses cite the document, saturating at 5. A draft hangs on the executed or issued document it drafts for, in the same folder. A draft with nothing executed behind it stays a small leaf on its own.

Folders and documents as a list
Documentsmade from

Contradictions

Not yet analysedThe roll-up found no contradictions between documents.

B-Brain is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. Built by site/build_site.py from the site tree, data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Brain is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask Brain in the header. Type a question, or pick one of the examples.

The site itself does not call an AI model; answers in Claude come from the same figures you see here.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations75
People at customers290
B-Brain staff40
Calls784
Email threads1,169
Support tickets449
Documents477
Deals117
Invoices101
Events49
News items56

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the brain from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

B-Brain is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration.

Who to contact

Email support@b-brain.example or talk to your B-Brain account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Ask B

Ask B

B-Brain · read-only