Priya Raman

Fenmoor Specialty Underwriting / BB-Demo – Exec Sponsor

Callcompleted

Fenmoor Specialty Underwriting: documents logo Fenmoor Specialty Underwriting: documents · 2026-03-18 09:45

Imogen Hartley, new Chief Data Officer, offered to sponsor the stalled move from Growth to Enterprise. Richard Thorne made no commitment and wants Callum and technology comfortable before it goes to the board. Target decision date is 31 Mar 2026.

What was said

What this says

Current to 10 Oct 26

Imogen Hartley, new Chief Data Officer, offered to sponsor the stalled move from Growth to Enterprise. Richard Thorne made no commitment and wants Callum and technology comfortable before it goes to the board. Target decision date is 31 Mar 2026.

What happened: Priya Raman framed the decision as Growth to Enterprise, nothing signed. The deal is £125,000 as total value with implementation included, not an annual price.

Customer view: Imogen said the upgrade had no sponsor and took ownership, with a one-page case for Richard. Richard accepted her owning it but said he makes no commitment today.

Commercial: Usage was put at around fifteen active a day, up nearly a third, against forty licences. Richard sees the platform today as an operations tool, and his test is what the capacity providers receive.

Watch: the Growth term ends 30 Jun 2026 and renews 1 Jul 2026 if no upgrade lands. A high-priority ticket is still to be explained.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 10 Oct 2026

Themes

Current to 9 Oct 26
Theme
Enterprise upgrade sponsorship
Importance
upsell
Sentiment
mixed
Voice
decision-maker

Who was there

BB-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Imogen to write a one-page case for Richard and speak to Callum that week.
  • Daniel Okafor to send usage and the ticket update by the end of that week and book a working session with Imogen.
  • Priya Raman to send the split of the deal between implementation and subscription on paper.

Risks

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Richard Thorne made no commitment and needs board approval, Callum's backing and a technology security view first.
  • A high-priority ticket is unexplained and could surface mid-negotiation.
  • If the upgrade slips, the Growth term renews on 1 Jul 2026 without the move to Enterprise.

Opportunities

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Imogen Hartley is a new executive sponsor with the standing to carry Enterprise across the firm.
  • Capacity-provider questions that cut across underwriting, claims and finance support a company-wide Enterprise case.

Transcript

  1. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Morning, everyone. Can everyone hear me? Imogen, I can see you, Daniel's here too. Richard, are you with us?
  2. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    I'm here. Good morning.
  3. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Morning, Priya. Morning, Daniel, lovely to see you. Richard, I think this is the first time you've been on a screen with the whole group.
  4. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Good morning, all, and thank you for making the time. Imogen, it's very good to be talking properly again. How are you finding the first weeks at Fenmoor?
  5. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Busy, in the best way. A great deal to learn and a great deal that's already in good shape. It's a bit odd to be on the customer side of the brain, I'll admit, but it feels right.
  6. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Well, that's the best possible start for this call. Shall I kick off with a quick recap, to keep momentum? Where we are, and the next date.
  7. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Before you do. What is the decision I'm being asked to make?
  8. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Fair question, Richard, and I'll answer it directly. The decision is whether Fenmoor moves from Growth to Enterprise. Nothing is being signed today. What we'd like is a shared view of what has to be true for that decision to be made in good time.
  9. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Good. Carry on.
  10. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    So, where we stand. You're on Growth today, at forty-four thousand a year, with forty licensed users. The upgrade to Enterprise is open as a deal with us, in negotiation, and the date we've been working to is the end of March, 31 Mar 2026. The value of the deal is a hundred and twenty-five thousand, and I want to be careful with that number. It's the total value of the deal, implementation included. It's not an annual price.
  11. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    What does this cost us, all in?
  12. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    All in, the deal is a hundred and twenty-five thousand. That covers the one-off implementation and the subscription together. Daniel can say what sits inside it and I'm happy to put the split on paper so you're not relying on my memory on a call.
  13. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    I'd want it on paper. Simply.
  14. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Simply. One page. Happy to make this easy.
  15. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    May I come in here? Because I think the real question is why this has stalled, and I'd rather say that plainly than have us all tiptoe around it.
  16. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Please do, Imogen.
  17. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    I've read the history. The case for Enterprise was made well by Priya and Daniel, and Callum's team has been using the brain properly. But when I arrived, the upgrade had no sponsor on our side. Callum had the day-to-day, Richard had the budget, and nobody had the conversation in between. That's how these things drift.
  18. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    That is a fair description.
  19. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    So let me say what I'd like to do. I'd like to take ownership of it. I've seen this work, I know what the brain does when it's company-wide, and I'd rather it were mine to carry than something that sits in everybody's inbox. If Richard is comfortable with that, I'll be the sponsor on our side.
  20. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    I am comfortable with you owning it. I'm not yet in a position to say more than that.
  21. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Which is exactly right, and I wouldn't ask you to. What I can do is bring you a case you can judge.
  22. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Imogen, if I may, that's very welcome from our side, and I'd say that having a sponsor at your level changes the conversation. Can I add a bit of context on usage, so we're all working from the same picture?
  23. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Please. I'd like to hear it before I write anything.
  24. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Over the last month, the average number of people active on a given day is around fifteen, and that's up by nearly a third on the quarter before. So the direction is the right one. It's still well short of the forty licences you have, so there's room in what you've already got.
  25. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Which is useful for both sides of the argument, isn't it. It shows people are adopting it, and it shows there's headroom before you need anything bigger.
  26. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    It does, and I wouldn't want to pretend otherwise. The honest way to put it is that Growth isn't failing you. The question is what you want the brain to do next, and whether that's something Growth can carry.
  27. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    And what is it that Growth cannot carry?
  28. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    In plain terms, Richard, Enterprise is for the company as a whole and for regulated buyers. It brings single sign-on and the user-provisioning side, a named executive sponsor on our side, and support that's quicker to respond on a serious problem. It's also designed for a much larger number of users and connectors than you have now.
  29. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    And the thing I care about, to put it in my language, is that Enterprise is what you'd choose if you thought of this as the data layer for the firm and not a tool for one department.
  30. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Is it a data layer for the firm, or is it a tool for the operations team?
  31. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Today it's the second. The real question is whether we want it to become the first. And my view, for what it's worth, is that the capacity providers are already asking questions that cut across underwriting, claims and finance. One view would answer them better.
  32. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    What the capacity providers think matters to me.
  33. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    I know it does. So let me frame it that way. Not as an upgrade, as a way of being able to answer them without a week's work every time.
  34. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    And just to add from my side, we've been very mindful of timing. If we can get this over the line by the end of the month, the implementation can start in good order. But I'd much rather we got it right than rushed, and I'll say that to Richard directly.
  35. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    I appreciate it. It would be unwise to rush.
  36. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    May I raise one more thing, so there's no surprise later? There was one high-priority ticket in the last month. I don't want to dwell on it, but I'd like to make sure that I close the loop on it with Callum and with you, Imogen, so it isn't something that comes up in the middle of a negotiation.
  37. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Thank you, Daniel, I'd rather know. Is it something I should worry about?
  38. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    I'd say no, but I'd be guessing if I told you more, and I'd prefer to give you the proper answer. I'll come back to you by the end of the week with the ticket, what happened and where it stands.
  39. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    That's all I'd ask.
  40. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Is there anything in the contract timing that I should be aware of?
  41. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Yes, good question. The current Growth term runs to 30 Jun 2026, and it renews on 1 Jul 2026. So there are two things happening in parallel. The upgrade, which we'd like to settle by the end of March, and the renewal, which will follow its own route if the upgrade isn't done.
  42. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    So if I decided to do nothing, the Growth contract renews.
  43. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    It would come up for renewal, and Daniel would run that conversation with you. I'd just say that moving to Enterprise before then is cleaner, because you'd be starting the new term on the right footing and not renewing something you'd outgrown.
  44. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    I'd put it slightly more carefully, if I may. Both routes are open to you, and neither is a mistake. What I'd want to avoid is a decision made in a hurry in June because the date has crept up.
  45. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    That is helpful. Thank you, Daniel.
  46. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Right. So may I propose what I'd do, and you tell me if it's sensible?
  47. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Please.
  48. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    First, I write a short case for Richard. No more than a page. What we use the brain for today, what changes with Enterprise, what it costs all in, and what the risk of not doing it is. I'll want Daniel's usage and Priya's numbers to put in it, and I'll want them accurate.
  49. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    You'll have the usage from me by the end of the week, together with the ticket.
  50. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    And I'll send the split of the deal, implementation and subscription, so the total is never in doubt. I'll make sure there's nothing in it that I haven't put a date against.
  51. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Second, I'd like us to agree who in the business has to be happy before it reaches the board. Richard, you'll tell me if I've missed someone.
  52. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    I'll need to take that to the board. Before that, I'd want to hear from Callum that the operations team will use it. And I'd want our own people in technology to be content with the security side.
  53. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Good. Then Callum is a conversation I'll have this week, and security is something I'll raise with our own people myself. Daniel, would your team be able to support a review if it came to it?
  54. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Yes. Security review support is part of how Enterprise is set up, and I'd make sure the right person from our side is available to your colleagues. I'll come back to you on who that would be.
  55. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Lovely. Third, and this is for me as much as anyone: I'd like a regular rhythm. A short call every couple of weeks until this is decided, the four of us, so it doesn't drift again.
  56. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    I'd be very happy with that. It keeps momentum, and honestly it makes my life simpler.
  57. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Short, and with an agenda.
  58. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Short, with an agenda, circulated beforehand. Agreed.
  59. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    I'll take the agenda, if that's helpful. I'd like to keep it to what's decided, what's open and who owns it, so each call starts where the last one left off.
  60. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Perfect.
  61. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Can I ask something about the capacity providers?
  62. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Of course.
  63. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    If we were to say to them that we are on this platform, across the firm, would that be received well? Or is it a detail they would not care about?
  64. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    I can't promise how any one syndicate would react. What I can say is that what they care about is the speed and the consistency of what we tell them. If the brain makes the answers quicker and the numbers match, that's what they'll notice. They won't notice the tier.
  65. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Then the argument must be about the answers and not the product.
  66. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Precisely. Let's make it count on that basis.
  67. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    That's a really clear framing, and I'll make sure the numbers I send follow it. Anything else from anyone before we pin down dates?
  68. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Just one, if I may. Imogen, I'd like to book a working session with you, an hour, to go through the data and connectors together. You know the brain well, so I don't expect to teach you much, but it'd be good to agree what the first phase would be.
  69. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    I'd welcome that. Do it before the next call and I'll arrive with a view.
  70. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    I'll send some times today.
  71. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Brilliant. So, to close, let me play it back. Imogen takes ownership on your side and writes the one-page case. Daniel sends usage and the ticket update by the end of the week, and sets up the working session. I send the split of the deal on paper. Richard, you take it to the board in your own time, and we aim to have a decision around the end of March, 31 Mar 2026, without anyone being rushed.
  72. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    That is acceptable. I make no commitment today.
  73. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Understood, and entirely fair.
  74. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    I'd add that the commitment today is mine, which is that this won't drift. You have my word.
  75. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Noted. Thank you, Imogen.
  76. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor None
    Thank you all. Imogen, welcome properly to the Fenmoor side of the table. Best wishes to Callum and the team.
  77. Imogen Hartley
    Imogen Hartley None
    Thank you, Daniel. Speak soon, everyone.
  78. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman None
    Thanks, all. Talk next week.
  79. Richard Thorne
    Richard Thorne None
    Regards. Goodbye.

BB-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Brain is the tool. Built by site/build_site.py from the site tree, data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Brain is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask Brain in the header. Type a question, or pick one of the examples.

The site itself does not call an AI model; answers in Claude come from the same figures you see here.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations75
People at customers290
BB-Demo staff40
Calls784
Email threads1,169
Support tickets449
Documents477
Deals117
Invoices101
Events49
News items56

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the brain from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BB-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Brain is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email support@b-brain.example or talk to your B-Brain account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Ask B

Ask B

B-Brain · read-only