Matteo Ricci

Hollowmere Care Group / BB-Demo – Proposal

Callcompleted

Hollowmere Care Group: documents logo Hollowmere Care Group: documents · 2026-03-03 15:45

Proposal call with Natasha Pryor on 3 Mar 2026. Enterprise proposed at a total deal value of £150,500 including implementation. She needs SSO, quarterly billing questions covered, a CFO call and a close by 27 Mar 2026.

What was said

What this says

Current to 11 Oct 26

Proposal call with Natasha Pryor on 3 Mar 2026. Enterprise proposed at a total deal value of £150,500 including implementation. She needs SSO, quarterly billing questions covered, a CFO call and a close by 27 Mar 2026.

What happened: On 3 Mar 2026 Matteo Ricci walked Natasha Pryor through an Enterprise proposal, aiming to close by 27 Mar 2026. Natasha wants to take the board something it can approve.

Commercial: The £150,500 is the total deal value with implementation included, not the annual subscription alone. Natasha expects Graham, the CFO, to ask about quarterly billing.

Customer view: Imran will not accept anything without SSO, and the security review must show where data sits, who can see it and the exit plan. Natasha asked for a realistic go-live date rather than a nice one.

Watch: Graham needs a call before the board paper goes out, with Owen, VP Sales, joining on terms. The evidence does not show whether the deal was signed.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · 11 Oct 2026

Themes

Current to 9 Oct 26
Theme
Enterprise proposal and CFO terms
Importance
neutral
Sentiment
positive
Voice
champion

Who was there

BB-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Matteo Ricci to send the proposal with the cost split set out clearly.
  • Matteo Ricci to propose times for a call with Graham, with Owen joining, early the following week.
  • Matteo Ricci to confirm the connector go-live schedule in writing once engineering has agreed it.

Risks

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • The CFO has not yet seen the cost split and may press on quarterly billing and terms.
  • The close target of 27 Mar 2026 depends on a board meeting and a CFO call happening first.
  • The first weeks of implementation are a known weak point because nobody on the customer side has time.

Opportunities

Current to 9 Oct 26
  • Enterprise fits company-wide use, SSO and the formal security review the customer needs.
  • Extra users are available as an add-on if the head office and home manager group grows.
  • Quarterly billing on request can be offered to match the group's cash flow.

Transcript

  1. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Natasha, good afternoon. Thank you for making time, I know it is a busy week.
  2. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Afternoon, Matteo. It is. I've got about twenty minutes before I'm pulled into a quality meeting, so let's go.
  3. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Of course. Let me restate the timeline first. Today I walk you through the proposal. We are aiming to close by 27 Mar 2026, which is what you told your board. Is that still where you are?
  4. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    That's still the plan. The board meets before then and I want to take them something they can approve, not a discussion paper.
  5. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Good. So, scope. We have proposed Enterprise. I would rather explain why, because I know it is not the cheapest option. You are company-wide across about forty homes, you have an IT and information governance team who will want a proper security review, and you need single sign-on, so that home managers do not have yet another password.
  6. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Imran will want SSO, yes. He won't accept anything without it. What about the number of users?
  7. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    The proposal covers your head office team and the home managers, with headroom. If you need more people later, extra users are an add-on and I'd rather you heard that now than discover it in a year.
  8. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Fine. What is the number on the page, all in? Graham will ask me first thing.
  9. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    The total value of the deal is £150,500. I want to be careful here: that is the total, with the implementation fee included, and it is not the annual subscription on its own. The proposal document splits the two so that Graham can see each line.
  10. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Right. So the first year looks heavier than the second, because of implementation.
  11. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Correct. Implementation is a one-off, fixed fee, covering the build and the security review support. After that it is the subscription, annual, in advance, though quarterly billing is possible on request.
  12. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Quarterly is something Graham will definitely ask about, it matches how the group's cash comes in. Let me flag that now so it's no surprise.
  13. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Noted, and thank you. I will make sure it is covered in the order form discussion.
  14. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    What does implementation look like in practice? I've done this before and the weak point is always the first weeks, when nobody on our side has time.
  15. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    A fair concern. You would have an implementation consultant from our side, and Josh as your admin and day-to-day contact. The connectors go live in stages, as Hannah described, contact and invoices first. Let me confirm the exact schedule in writing, because I do not want to commit a date that engineering has not agreed.
  16. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Good. I'd rather have a realistic date than a nice one.
  17. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Can I ask about the security review? Imran's team will want questionnaires answered properly, and the evidence.
  18. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Yes. For Enterprise there is a formal review, and our solutions team answers each question with evidence attached. If there is anything we cannot evidence, we will say so. I would rather you heard it from me than found it later. What does your regulator need to see, or Imran's team, as a minimum?
  19. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Where data sits, who can see it, how you get out if it doesn't work. The exit plan, mainly.
  20. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Understood. Because it runs in your own Snowflake account, the data stays with you, which makes the exit question simpler. We will put the details in the review pack.
  21. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Okay. Then what I need from you is the proposal in a form I can forward to Graham, and a call with him, so he can ask his questions himself.
  22. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    Certainly. I will send the proposal today, with the cost split clearly set out. And I will bring my colleague Owen, our VP Sales, to the conversation with your CFO, as it will be about terms.
  23. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Good. Early next week would be best, before the board paper goes out.
  24. Matteo Ricci
    Matteo Ricci None
    I will propose times this afternoon. Thank you, Natasha.
  25. Natasha Pryor
    Natasha Pryor None
    Thanks, Matteo. Speak soon.

BB-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Brain is the tool. Built by site/build_site.py from the site tree, data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Brain is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask Brain in the header. Type a question, or pick one of the examples.

The site itself does not call an AI model; answers in Claude come from the same figures you see here.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations75
People at customers290
BB-Demo staff40
Calls784
Email threads1,169
Support tickets449
Documents477
Deals117
Invoices101
Events49
News items56

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the brain from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BB-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Brain is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email support@b-brain.example or talk to your B-Brain account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Ask B

Ask B

B-Brain · read-only